In re Estate of Maheras
Oklahoma Supreme Court
897 P.2d 268 (1995)

- Written by Melissa Hammond, JD
Facts
William H. Cook (defendant), pastor of the First Baptist Church of Bartlesville (First Baptist), became acquainted with Evelyn Afton Maheras, an elderly alcoholic, during the 1970s. He visited her home frequently from 1980–1983, and by 1984, Maheras had become quite dependent upon Cook and other First Baptist members, who regularly helped clean her home. Cook put Jesse J. Worten III, an attorney and First Baptist member, in touch with Maheras about preparing her will. Cook delivered the will to Maheras, they discussed the terms, and Worten followed up with another short phone conversation. In February 1984, a First Baptist member took Maheras to Worten’s office to execute the will. The attesting witnesses were First Baptist members chosen by Cook. Cook was named co-executor of the will, and First Baptist was the recipient of the bulk of Maheras’s estate. Maheras died testate at the age of 96. The witnesses testified that Maheras understood the will and was aware of the existence of her nephew, Richard H. Suagee (plaintiff). Suagee contested the will, claiming, among other things, that Cook unduly influenced Maheras. The district court found that Maheras had been unduly influenced by Cook, and Cook appealed. The appellate court found that because Cook had not personally benefited from the will, he was legally incapable of unduly influencing Maheras. Suagee appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Opala, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.