In re Estate of McFarland

167 S.W.3d 299 (2005)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Estate of McFarland

Tennessee Supreme Court
167 S.W.3d 299 (2005)

Facts

Merle McFarland’s will stated that the residuary of her estate, i.e., the property left after all the specific gifts had been distributed, should be divided equally among 18 listed beneficiaries. Three of these beneficiaries died before McFarland, which meant that the gifts to those three people lapsed. None of these three beneficiaries left behind a spouse or any living children or grandchildren. After McFarland’s death, the 15 surviving residuary beneficiaries and the estate administrator (plaintiffs) claimed that the residue of McFarland’s estate should be divided into 15 shares for the remaining listed beneficiaries. However, McFarland’s legal heirs (defendants) argued that the residuary should be divided into the listed 18 shares, with the three lapsed shares going to McFarland’s legal heirs in accordance with the laws of intestate succession, i.e., with those three portions being distributed as if McFarland had not left a will. The probate court found that the three lapsed shares should be distributed to McFarland’s heirs under the intestacy laws. The estate appealed the ruling.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Barker, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership