In re Estate of Saucier
Mississippi Court of Appeals
908 So. 2d 883 (2005)
When Jerry Saucier (Jerry) died, two wills were submitted to probate. The first will left the majority of Jerry’s estate to his son. The second will left Jerry’s entire estate to Susan Tatum (defendant). Tatum was Jerry’s caretaker and girlfriend, and the two had discussed plans to marry. Tatum helped Jerry prepare the second will and was present when he signed it. James Saucier (James) (plaintiff), Jerry’s father, contested the second will, claiming that it was the product of Tatum’s undue influence. At trial, employees of the bank where Jerry signed the second will testified that Jerry seemed of sound mind and that Tatum did not appear to be an overbearing force in the will’s creation or execution. The Chancery Court of Forrest County found that Tatum successfully rebutted the presumption of undue influence. James appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Ishee, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.