From our private database of 33,800+ case briefs...
In Re Exide Technologies
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
607 F.3d 957 (2010)
Battery manufacturer Exide Technologies (Exide) (debtor) sold its industrial-battery business to EnerSys Delaware, Inc. (EnerSys) for $135 million in 1991. Exide granted EnerSys a license to use the Exide trademark in the industrial-battery business, while Exide continued to use the trademark for other products. EnerSys assumed Exide’s liabilities, including numerous contracts and accounts receivable, and operated the business for over 10 years. In 2000, Exide wanted to reenter the industrial-battery business and use the trademark on all its products, but EnerSys refused to relinquish the trademark rights. Exide reentered the business by acquiring another battery company while remaining bound by the trademark-license agreement. That meant Exide had to compete directly with EnerSys selling batteries under the Exide name. In 2002, Exide filed for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code and asked the bankruptcy court to approve rejection of the trademark-license agreement and three related agreements as executory contracts with unperformed obligations. For example, the trademark agreement required EnerSys to observe use restrictions, not use the trademark outside the industrial-battery business, and follow quality standards, but Exide never actually provided quality standards. The agreements also imposed ongoing indemnity and further assurances obligations. The bankruptcy court treated the agreements as a single integrated agreement with a New York choice-of-law provision, concluded the agreement qualified as an executory contract under New York law, and approved rejection. The district court affirmed, and EnerSys appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Roth, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 605,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 605,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,800 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.