In re Facebook, Inc.
Federal Trade Commission
FTC Docket No. C-4365 (July 24, 2019)
- Written by Jamie Milne, JD
Facts
In 2012, Facebook, Inc. (defendant) entered a consent order (the 2012 order) with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) (plaintiff) that barred Facebook from misrepresenting both the extent of Facebook’s data sharing with third-party applications and the extent of consumer control over such sharing. The 2012 order also required Facebook to establish a reasonable privacy-protection program. When the FTC later became concerned that Facebook was not complying with the 2012 order, FTC staff conducted a thorough investigation. After the investigation, the FTC filed suit against Facebook in federal district court, alleging that Facebook was violating the 2012 order by (1) making misrepresentations regarding third-party data sharing, (2) misrepresenting consumer control over sharing and the steps consumers needed to take to control certain sharing, and (3) allowing financial considerations to influence enforcement of its policies and thus failing to maintain a reasonable privacy-protection program. The complaint also alleged that Facebook violated § 5 of the FTC Act by engaging in new deceptive practices regarding consumer phone numbers collected for account-security purposes. Facebook and the FTC engaged in settlement negotiations that resulted in the entry of a stipulated order agreed to by the parties.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Simons, Chairman)
Dissent (Slaughter, Comm’r)
Dissent (Chopra, Comm’r)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.