In re: Facebook Privacy Litigation
United States District Court for the Northern District of California
192 F. Supp. 3d 1053 (2016)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Wendy Marfeo (plaintiff) sued Facebook, Inc. (defendant) for breach of contract and fraud. Marfeo claimed that Facebook promised its users, including Marfeo, that it would not share any user’s personal identifiable information to third parties. Marfeo claimed that Facebook breached that promise. Generally, if an Internet user clicked on a link to a third-party website, something known as a referer header included an identification of the website from which the click came. Marfeo alleged that if a Facebook user navigated to her own Facebook profile page and then clicked a link to a third-party website, the referer header included enough information to identify the Facebook user. Facebook acknowledged that this was the case in theory. However, Facebook filed a motion to dismiss Marfeo’s lawsuit for lack of standing. Facebook claimed that Marfeo had not suffered injury in fact due to any breach of contract. Marfeo argued that she suffered injury in fact because she was denied the benefit of her bargain with Facebook and that she was entitled to nominal damages for Facebook’s breach of contract.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Whyte, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.