In re Fort Dodge Roofing Co.
United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Iowa
50 B.R. 666 (1985)
- Written by Douglas Halasz, JD
Facts
Fort Dodge Roofing Co. (debtor) purchased building materials from Stetson Building Products Corp. (Stetson) (creditor) using an open account. As of May 7, 1982, Fort Dodge Roofing owed Stetson over $170,000 for materials. Consequently, Stetson refused to provide additional materials to Fort Dodge Roofing unless Fort Dodge Roofing arranged to pay the outstanding balance. Accordingly, on the same date, Fort Dodge Roofing agreed to transfer to Stetson seven accounts receivable totaling $52,000, including an account receivable owed by Malta High School comprising approximately 6.2 percent of Fort Dodge Roofing’s debt. On its face, the instrument used to transfer the accounts appeared to be an absolute assignment of the accounts. However, Stetson did not credit any amounts to Fort Dodge Roofing’s outstanding balance and maintained that Fort Dodge Roofing owed the entire $170,000 balance. Stetson was not involved in the commercial-lending business and had accepted an assignment of accounts receivable only once before, approximately two years before this assignment. Thereafter, Fort Dodge Roofing filed for bankruptcy. The bankruptcy trustee sought to avoid Stetson’s interest in the account owed by Malta High School. The bankruptcy trustee argued that Stetson held merely a security interest in the account, which Stetson had not perfected by filing a financing statement. Stetson argued that even if Fort Dodge Roofing had not absolutely assigned the account to Stetson, Stetson was not required to file a financing statement pursuant to Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) § 9-302(1)(e).
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Thinnes, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.