In re General Motors Corp. Pick-Up Truck Fuel Tank Products Liability Litigation

55 F.3d 768 (1995)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re General Motors Corp. Pick-Up Truck Fuel Tank Products Liability Litigation

United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
55 F.3d 768 (1995)

  • Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD

Facts

Fuel-tank fires in pick-up trucks with side-saddle gas tanks sparked dozens of class actions against manufacturer General Motors Corporation (GM) (defendant). After consolidation, nearly 300 individual and fleet owners filed an amended complaint that sought to make GM recall the “rolling firebombs” or pay for repairs. The claimants also moved to certify a nationwide class of approximately 5.7 million members, owners of 6.3 million trucks that had not yet had fuel-tank mishaps. About four months into discovery as to class-certification issues only, the named claimants and GM agreed to a settlement. GM would give each class member a $1,000 coupon or issue a third party a $500 coupon redeemable for 15 months toward the purchase of a new truck. The court provisionally certified the settlement class and approved sending putative class members a combined notice of the class action and the proposed settlement. The notice omitted that GM had agreed to pay the claimants’ attorneys nearly $9.5 million. Over 5,200 owners opted out of the class, and approximately 6,500 objected to the settlement, particularly fleet owners with more than 1,000 trucks each. After the claimants’ expert valued the certificates at about $2 billion based on 36 percent of owners redeeming $1,000 certificates and 11 percent selling $500 certificates, the court confirmed class certification and approved the settlement. Numerous objectors appealed challenging the fairness and reasonableness of the settlement, claiming it was a sophisticated GM marketing program.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Becker, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership