In re Google Inc.

FTC File No. 1023136 (2011)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Google Inc.

United States Federal Trade Commission
FTC File No. 1023136 (2011)

  • Written by Tammy Boggs, JD

Facts

Initially, Google Inc. (defendant) offered a web-based electronic-mail service to its users, called Gmail. Google placed a notice of its privacy policies and practices on its website, stating in essence that Gmail stored, processed, and maintained consumers’ messages, contact lists, and other account data in order to provide the mail service. The policy also informed consumers that their personal information was used for a particular service, and if Google were to use information in a different manner, the user’s consent would be obtained prior to the different use. Thereafter, Google launched a social-networking service, called Buzz, within the Gmail product. In Buzz, users could post updates, photos, and comments. Without prior notice to consumers, Google set up Buzz accounts for Gmail users, populating their accounts with “followers” based on a user’s email contacts and having the user automatically “follow” other users. The set-up process for Buzz did not adequately disclose the automatic sharing of user information; the features and controls in Buzz were confusing; and users often did not know how to completely opt out of Buzz. For example, even if a user selected the option “Turn off Buzz,” the user was still enrolled in certain features of Buzz. A user could find herself “following” an abusive ex-husband or any number of email contacts, against the user’s will. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) initiated an enforcement action against Google, alleging that Google misinformed its users regarding the extent of use of consumer information. Google consented to entry of an order.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership