In re Google Inc.
United States Federal Trade Commission
FTC File No. 1023136 (2011)
- Written by Tammy Boggs, JD
Facts
Initially, Google Inc. (defendant) offered a web-based electronic-mail service to its users, called Gmail. Google placed a notice of its privacy policies and practices on its website, stating in essence that Gmail stored, processed, and maintained consumers’ messages, contact lists, and other account data in order to provide the mail service. The policy also informed consumers that their personal information was used for a particular service, and if Google were to use information in a different manner, the user’s consent would be obtained prior to the different use. Thereafter, Google launched a social-networking service, called Buzz, within the Gmail product. In Buzz, users could post updates, photos, and comments. Without prior notice to consumers, Google set up Buzz accounts for Gmail users, populating their accounts with “followers” based on a user’s email contacts and having the user automatically “follow” other users. The set-up process for Buzz did not adequately disclose the automatic sharing of user information; the features and controls in Buzz were confusing; and users often did not know how to completely opt out of Buzz. For example, even if a user selected the option “Turn off Buzz,” the user was still enrolled in certain features of Buzz. A user could find herself “following” an abusive ex-husband or any number of email contacts, against the user’s will. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) initiated an enforcement action against Google, alleging that Google misinformed its users regarding the extent of use of consumer information. Google consented to entry of an order.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning ()
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.