In re Grand Jury Subpoena
United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
274 F.3d 563 (2001)
Due to the confidential nature of grand jury proceedings, the court used fictitious names in its opinion. Oldco, a subsidiary company of Newparent, pled guilty to conspiracy to defraud the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and agreed to cooperate with the federal government in an ongoing investigation into the company’s practices and its officers. As part of that cooperation, Oldco agreed to waive attorney-client and work product privileges. Thereafter, a federal grand jury issued a subpoena duces tecum to Newparent seeking information related to Oldco’s “rebate program.” The subpoena sought records dating back to before Oldco was a subsidiary of Newparent. Before Newparent acquired Oldco it was a closely-held corporation run by Richard Roe and Morris Moe. Lawyer served as Oldco’s outside counsel. Roe, Moe, and Lawyer filed a motion to quash the subpoena claiming a longstanding joint defense agreement that provided that all communications among the three individuals were privileged. The district court denied the motion to quash. Roe, Moe, and Lawyer appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Selya, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 171,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.