In re Griffith
Court of Appeals of Ohio
585 N.E.2d 937 (1991)

- Written by Sara Rhee, JD
Facts
The Ohio Veterinary Medical Board (Board) (plaintiff) issued formal written charges against Don Griffith, D.V.M. (defendant) after Griffith performed a surgical procedure on a kitten. The Board held a hearing during which Griffith presented an expert witness. The Board found the procedure did not meet minimum standards of care. The Board issued a written reprimand to Griffith. The Franklin County Court of Common Pleas affirmed the order of the Board. Griffith appealed, arguing the Board improperly substituted its own expert opinion for that of Griffith’s expert witness.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Strasbaugh, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 967,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,500 briefs, keyed to 1,007 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
- AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New
Understand your casebook readings in seconds
Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.
Get instant access to over 47,500+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,007 law school casebooks.


