In re Guardianship of Inez B. Way

901 P.2d 349 (1995)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Guardianship of Inez B. Way

Washington Court of Appeals
901 P.2d 349 (1995)

Facts

Inez Way (defendant), who was in her seventies and bedridden, lived with Al Soper and depended on him for care. However, Soper, who was in his eighties, had heart problems and was in the early stages of dementia. After numerous citizens called Washington’s Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS) (plaintiff) to express concern about Way’s well-being, the DSHS went to the residence to investigate. It found Way living in deplorable conditions. Way was laying in the bed covered in urine and feces, her hair was dirty and matted, and her skin was red and sore. Additionally, the residence itself was in poor condition. It needed various structural repairs, lacked functional plumbing and heating, and was infested with rats. The DSHS also discovered that Soper lacked a driver’s license and was unable to drive to obtain groceries. Consequently, both Soper and Way were dependent on transient visitors who stayed in the house to bring them groceries and other supplies. After conducting its investigation, the DSHS petitioned for the appointment of a guardian for Way. The jury concluded that Way was incapacitated as to both her person and her property. It imposed a full guardianship for Way’s property, meaning that an appointed guardian was to make all property-related decisions on Way’s behalf. However, it imposed only a limited guardianship for Way’s person, concluding that Way should retain certain rights, including the right to consent to medical treatment, determine her residence, vote, hold an elected office, decide who should provide care and assistance, and make social decisions. The DSHS moved for reconsideration, arguing that a full guardianship should have been imposed for Way’s person. The trial court imposed limitations on Way’s right to decide who should provide care and assistance but otherwise denied the motion. The DSHS appealed. Before the appeal came before the court, Way was moved to a care home that provided for her personal needs and also began receiving physical therapy and medical treatment.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Grosse, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership