In re Gulfgate Marine Transport Company
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
10 F.3d 1190, 1994 AMC 1253 (1994)
- Written by Carolyn Strutton, JD
Facts
A/S Dampskibsselskabet Svendborg (Svendborg) (plaintiff) was the owner/operator of a gas tanker that continuously moved cargo via sequential charters. Svendborg would typically arrange the vessel’s next charter during its current charter, and the vessel was never idle. During one charter in the Mississippi River, Svendborg’s tanker was struck and damaged by barges owned by Gulfgate Marine Transport Co. (Gulfgate) (defendant). Svendborg’s tanker lost 6.6 days of operational time getting repairs that were required as a result of the collision. Svendborg arranged the timing of the repairs to ensure that it could complete its scheduled charters successfully despite the repairs and lost time. Svendborg sued Gulfgate to recover detention damages for the time lost due to the repairs. The district court awarded Svendborg its claimed detention damages. Gulfgate appealed, alleging that Svendborg was not entitled to detention damages because it had not shown that it had lost a specific amount of revenue as the result of the detention.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Wiener, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.