In Re HealthSouth Corp. Shareholders Litigation
Delaware Court of Chancery
845 A.2d 1096 (2003)

- Written by Douglas Halasz, JD
Facts
HealthSouth, Inc.’s shareholders (plaintiffs) approved a plan that permitted HealthSouth to make loans to its corporate executives to help the executives purchase HealthSouth common stock. Richard Scrushy (defendant) was a HealthSouth executive. In 1999, HealthSouth loaned Scrushy over $25 million dollars, which Scrushy used to buy shares of HealthSouth common stock. In June 2002, Scrushy approached HealthSouth’s board of directors and indicated that he was willing to repay the loan early with HealthSouth stock. After considering the proposal, the board agreed to the transaction and valued Scrushy’s stock based on an average of the stock’s high and low trading prices on July 31, 2002. The parties completed the transaction on August 1, 2002. Less than a month later, the public learned that HealthSouth had been releasing materially misleading financial information such that the stock price had been inflated. Consequently, the stock that HealthSouth accepted from Scrushy as repayment of the loan was severely below the value of the loan. The shareholders subsequently filed a derivative claim against Scrushy under theories of unjust enrichment and equitable fraud. The shareholders moved for summary judgment. Scrushy opposed the motion and argued that a genuine dispute existed as to whether he had actual knowledge of the corporation’s misleading financial information. Notwithstanding significant evidence that Scrushy had a role in a fraudulent scheme orchestrated by the corporate executives, the shareholders argued that actual knowledge was irrelevant for summary-judgment purposes.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Strine, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.