In re Heinrich
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
7 A.3d 1158 (2010)
- Written by Craig Conway, LLM
Facts
Eric Heinrich (plaintiff) filed for divorce from Mary Ellen Curotto (defendant). During their 12-year marriage, Heinrich and Curotto had raised three minor boys and moved from Florida to New Hampshire for Heinrich’s work as a professional chef. Curotto claimed that the stay in New Hampshire was intended to be no longer than five years before Heinrich and Curotto planned to move back to Florida. Heinrich denied the claim. Curotto cross-petitioned for divorce, seeking primary residential custody of the boys so that she could move back to Florida and work in a managerial position for her family’s hotel. The trial court appointed a guardian ad litem (GAL) to determine whether relocation to Florida would be in the boys’ best interests. The GAL concluded that the boys were closely tied to both Heinrich and Curotto and that the boys’ relationship with Heinrich would suffer a loss if they were separated. After a hearing, the trial court granted the divorce, denied Curotto’s request to relocate to Florida, held that Heinrich was entitled to reimbursement for overpayment of child support, and required that the boys remain in the care of a third-party caretaker for more than 48 hours before either parent could be offered the right to care for the children. Curotto appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hicks, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.