In re Herbert

405 B.R. 165 (2008)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Herbert

United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of North Carolina
405 B.R. 165 (2008)

  • Written by Jody Stuart, JD

Facts

Thomas Herbert (debtor) filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy in North Carolina. Herbert lived with his girlfriend, his biological daughter, and his girlfriend’s eight children from a previous relationship. They had all lived together for several years, and Herbert had consistently supported his girlfriend and the children during that time. Herbert claimed a household size of 11 on Form B22A of the bankruptcy filing. Herbert’s annualized current monthly income was $109,500, which was less than the median family income of $111,469 for a household size of 11 in North Carolina. Accordingly, Herbert was not required to complete the rest of Form B22A. The bankruptcy administrator moved to dismiss Herbert’s case, arguing that Herbert was only entitled to claim a household size of two: Herbert and his biological daughter. This would make the applicable median family income equal to $49,259, which would leave sufficient disposable income for Herbert to pay creditors some portion of their claims. Therefore, the bankruptcy administrator moved to dismiss the case as an abuse of Chapter 7.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Hodges, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 820,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership