In re HHGREGG, Inc.
United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Indiana
578 B.R. 814 (2017)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
Gregg Appliances, Inc., hhgregg, Inc., and HHG Distributing, LLC (collectively, HHGregg) (debtor) operated a chain of retail stores that sold appliances. Whirlpool Corporation (creditor) routinely sold goods to HHGregg, including during the 45 days before HHGregg filed for bankruptcy. Whirlpool made a timely demand to reclaim its goods by sending a demand letter to HHGregg four days after it filed for bankruptcy, followed by filing an adversary proceeding seeking either the return of the goods or the proceeds from any post-petition sales. Before filing, HHGregg had a revolving credit agreement with Wells Fargo as administrative and collateral agent for other lenders. Wells Fargo advances were secured with first priority floating liens on virtually all of HHGregg’s assets, including existing and future inventory (like Whirlpool appliances) and its proceeds. In the adversary proceeding, Whirlpool argued that Wells Fargo was not entitled to protection as a good-faith purchaser under Uniform Commercial Code § 2-702 because it continued to lend to HHGregg on the eve of bankruptcy, allegedly when Wells Fargo knew HHGregg could not pay vendors like Whirlpool. Wells Fargo’s priority lien in the inventory made Whirlpool’s reclamation claim virtually worthless. Wells Fargo and the lenders countered that good faith is irrelevant under Bankruptcy Code § 546(1) as amended in 2005, making Whirlpool’s reclamation claim subject to Wells Fargo and the lenders’ prior lien rights.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Graham, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.