In re Himmel
Illinois Supreme Court
533 N.E.2d 790 (1988)
- Written by Craig Conway, LLM
Facts
Tammy Forsberg hired attorney John Casey to handle a personal injury claim arising out of a motorcycle accident. Casey settled the case for $35,000, and stole $23,233 of Forsberg’s money. Forsberg then retained attorney James Himmel (defendant) to recover the money taken by Casey. Himmel had knowledge of Casey’s illegal act, but decided to negotiate a settlement with him instead of reporting his conduct to the state bar. Casey agreed to pay Forsberg $75,000 in settlement of any claim she might have against him. In return, Forsberg agreed not to criminally prosecute the matter nor refer Casey to the state bar for discipline. After Casey failed to pay per the settlement agreement, Himmel filed suit against him for breach of the agreement. The case was eventually settled. Casey was later disbarred for an unrelated matter. The Administrator (plaintiff) of the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission (the Commission) filed a complaint against Himmel for failing to report Casey’s misconduct. A hearing board concluded that Himmel violated Rule 1-103(a) of the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct and recommended a private reprimand. On appeal, the Review Panel recommended the complaint be dismissed. The Administrator appealed. The Illinois Supreme Court granted certiorari to review.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Stamos, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 797,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.