In re Image Worldwide, Limited
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
139 F.3d 574 (1997)
- Written by Ryan Hill, JD
Facts
Richard Steinberg was the owner and sole officer of Image Marketing, Ltd. (Image). Image leased space from FCL Graphics (FCL). Image borrowed $300,000 from Parkway Bank (Parkway) (creditor) in 1992. By the end of 1993, Image was also several hundred thousand dollars in debt to other creditors. Steinway then formed a new corporation, Image Worldwide, Ltd. (Worldwide) (debtor), which leased the same space from FCL and used the same suppliers. In 1994, Steinberg liquidated Image and used the proceeds to pay off some of Image’s creditors. In lieu of demanding payment on Image’s line of credit, Parkway required Worldwide to guarantee Image’s debt. Worldwide agreed to secure Image’s debt with a priority lien in Worldwide’s assets. Parkway then lent Steinberg an additional $200,000 to pay Image’s remaining debt to FCL. Worldwide also guaranteed this loan. Worldwide paid the principal and interest on the Image loan and the Steinberg loan, and FCL continued to lease space to Worldwide. Worldwide became insolvent as a result of the guarantees and eventually failed. In 1995, FCL stopped doing business with Worldwide and filed an involuntary chapter 7 bankruptcy petition against Worldwide. Parkway lifted the automatic stay and collected from Worldwide’s accounts receivable. The bankruptcy trustee sought to recover the guarantees given to Parkway as fraudulent transfers. The bankruptcy court held that the transfers were fraudulent because Worldwide did not receive reasonably equivalent value for its guarantees, and the district court affirmed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Eschbach, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.