Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

In re Image Worldwide, Limited

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
139 F.3d 574 (1998)


Facts

Richard Steinberg was the owner and sole officer of Image Marketing, Ltd. (Image). Image leased space from FCL Graphics (FCL). Image borrowed $300,000 from Parkway Bank (Parkway) (creditor) in 1992. By the end of 1993, Image was also several hundred thousand dollars in debt to other creditors. Steinway then formed a new corporation, Image Worldwide, Ltd. (Worldwide) (debtor), which leased the same space from FCL and used the same suppliers. In 1994, Steinberg liquidated Image and used the proceeds to pay off some of Image’s creditors. In lieu of demanding payment on Image’s line of credit, Parkway required Worldwide to guarantee Image’s debt. Worldwide agreed to secure Image’s debt with a priority lien in Worldwide’s assets. Parkway then lent Steinberg an additional $200,000 to pay Image’s remaining debt to FCL. Worldwide also guaranteed this loan. Worldwide paid the principal and interest on the Image loan and the Steinberg loan, and FCL continued to lease space to Worldwide. Worldwide became insolvent as a result of the guarantees and eventually failed. In 1995, FCL stopped doing business with Worldwide and filed an involuntary chapter 7 bankruptcy petition against Worldwide. Parkway lifted the automatic stay and collected from Worldwide’s accounts receivable. The bankruptcy trustee sought to recover the guarantees given to Parkway as fraudulent transfers. The bankruptcy court held that the transfers were fraudulent because Worldwide did not receive reasonably equivalent value for its guarantees, and the district court affirmed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Eschbach, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 176,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.