In re InfoUSA, Inc. Shareholders Litigation
Delaware Court of Chancery
953 A.2d 963 (2007)
- Written by Katherine Li, JD
Facts
Company infoUSA, Inc. (infoUSA) was a Delaware corporation. Shareholders (plaintiffs) brought derivative lawsuits against infoUSA’s directors: V. Gupta, Haddix, Raval, Fairfield, A. Gupta, Kaplan, Kahn, Reznicek, Walker, Andersen, and Stryker (defendants). The complaints alleged that the directors engaged in massive, self-interested transactions, mostly transactions that benefited the company’s chief executive officer (CEO) and largest shareholder, V. Gupta. For example, infoUSA allegedly paid for V. Gupta’s use of private jets and a yacht, personal residence, and unrelated travel expenses. Further, Kaplan, Walker, Haddix, Kahn, and Raval allegedly approved the company’s 10-Ks [required Securities and Exchange Commission filings] with knowledge that they contained material misrepresentations. For example, while the 10-Ks stated that payments were for “usage of aircraft and related services,” the payments were actually compensation for personal residences. Further, Kaplan’s law firm received about $500,000 in legal fees per year from infoUSA. Raval received a $50,000 grant from the V. Gupta School of Business Administration, and both V. Gupta and Haddix were connected with Raval’s employer. Haddix and Walker allegedly received rent-free office space from infoUSA to operate their businesses. Allegations against the remaining directors were vague and insufficient. The defendants moved to dismiss.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Chandler, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.