In re J-Y-C-
Board of Immigration Appeals
24 I. & N. Dec. 260 (2007)
- Written by Eric DiVito, JD
Facts
J-Y-C- (plaintiff) was a citizen of China who attempted to enter the United States. J-Y-C- was interviewed by the Department of Homeland Security, after which he was placed into removal proceedings. In September 2006, J-Y-C- filed his application for relief. As the basis for his relief, J-Y-C- alleged that he was persecuted in China for practicing his Christian faith. For example, J-Y-C- testified that he was arrested after visiting a home church on January 1, 2005. J-Y-C- testified that he was imprisoned for 48 hours, during which time he was slapped and otherwise mistreated. J-Y-C- also claimed to have hosted two home-church meetings after his arrest, which led to additional police harassment and to his decision to hire a smuggler to help him leave China. J-Y-C- testified that his sister was present at the first church meeting that he hosted. J-Y-C-’s sister testified that she heard from her father that J-Y-C- was detained for only 20 hours and that she was at J-Y-C-’s home for only 15 minutes on the date of the first meeting, not for the full meeting. J-Y-C-’s sister also failed to corroborate that any religious activity took place at the meeting. The immigration judge (IJ) identified several inconsistencies between J-Y-C-’s and his sister’s testimonies. The IJ also identified inconsistencies between J-Y-C-’s testimony and the statements he made in his interview with the Department of Homeland Security. Considering these inconsistencies, as well as J-Y-C-’s demeanor and the inherent implausibility of some of his claims, the IJ found that J-Y-C- lacked credibility. The IJ denied J-Y-C-’s claim.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hurwitz, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 966,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,500 briefs, keyed to 1,007 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
- AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New
Understand your casebook readings in seconds
Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.
Get instant access to over 47,500+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,007 law school casebooks.

