From our private database of 37,500+ case briefs...
In re J-Y-C-
Board of Immigration Appeals
24 I. & N. Dec. 260 (2007)
Facts
J-Y-C- (plaintiff) was a citizen of China who attempted to enter the United States. J-Y-C- was interviewed by the Department of Homeland Security, after which he was placed into removal proceedings. In September 2006, J-Y-C- filed his application for relief. As the basis for his relief, J-Y-C- alleged that he was persecuted in China for practicing his Christian faith. For example, J-Y-C- testified that he was arrested after visiting a home church on January 1, 2005. J-Y-C- testified that he was imprisoned for 48 hours, during which time he was slapped and otherwise mistreated. J-Y-C- also claimed to have hosted two home-church meetings after his arrest, which led to additional police harassment and to his decision to hire a smuggler to help him leave China. J-Y-C- testified that his sister was present at the first church meeting that he hosted. J-Y-C-’s sister testified that she heard from her father that J-Y-C- was detained for only 20 hours and that she was at J-Y-C-’s home for only 15 minutes on the date of the first meeting, not for the full meeting. J-Y-C-’s sister also failed to corroborate that any religious activity took place at the meeting. The immigration judge (IJ) identified several inconsistencies between J-Y-C-’s and his sister’s testimonies. The IJ also identified inconsistencies between J-Y-C-’s testimony and the statements he made in his interview with the Department of Homeland Security. Considering these inconsistencies, as well as J-Y-C-’s demeanor and the inherent implausibility of some of his claims, the IJ found that J-Y-C- lacked credibility. The IJ denied J-Y-C-’s claim.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hurwitz, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 631,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 37,500 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.