In re Jane Doe
Supreme Court of Georgia
418 S.E.2d 3 (1992)
- Written by Craig Conway, LLM
Facts
Scottish Rite Hospital (the hospital) (plaintiff) filed an action for a declaratory judgment, seeking guidance from the trial court regarding whether to follow a do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order for a terminally ill 13-year-old girl, Jane Doe, who suffered from a degenerative neurological disease. Jane’s physicians described Jane’s condition as fluctuating between states of stupor and coma due to a failing brain stem. The physicians concluded that there was no hope for Jane’s recovery. As Jane’s condition worsened, Jane was placed on a respirator and had to use feeding and breathing tubes. The physicians asked Jane’s parents whether they would agree to a DNR order in the event that Jane suffered cardiac arrest. The DNR order would allow the hospital to refrain from providing life-saving measures to Jane. Jane’s mother consented to the DNR order, but Jane’s father did not. The hospital’s bioethics committee recommended the DNR order and the de-escalation of Jane’s medical treatment. After an evidentiary hearing, the trial court found that the hospital had standing to bring a declaratory action but entered an order enjoining the hospital from de-escalating Jane’s medical treatment or enforcing a DNR order unless both parents agreed. The state appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Clarke, J.)
Concurrence (Hunt, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.