In re Japanese Electronic Products Antitrust Litigation

631 F.2d 1069 (1980)

From our private database of 47,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Japanese Electronic Products Antitrust Litigation

United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
631 F.2d 1069 (1980)

Catherine Cotovsky headshot
  • Written by Catherine Cotovsky, JD

Facts

National Union Electric Corp. (NUE) (plaintiff) and Zenith Radio Corp. (Zenith) (plaintiff) brought separate actions against several Japanese producers of consumer electronics (Japanese companies) (defendants) for violations of numerous statutes governing domestic competition, international trade, anti-dumping, conspiracy, and price discrimination. Both actions sought treble damages and injunctive relief for activities that occurred over the course of several years from the mid-1960s through the late 1970s. The district court consolidated the actions for pre-trial and trial, and the parties engaged in several years of discovery that produced millions of documents and thousands of pages of depositions. NUE and Zenith both made demands for jury trial, but the Japanese companies moved to strike the jury demands on the grounds that the matter was too complicated, complex, and burdensome for a jury to fairly decide. The district court denied the Japanese companies’ motions to strike, and the appellate court took up the Japanese companies’ interlocutory appeal.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Seitz, C.J.)

Dissent (Gibbons, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 950,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 950,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,400 briefs, keyed to 1,004 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
  • AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New

Understand your casebook readings in seconds

Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.

Get instant access to over 47,400+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,004 law school casebooks.

Case book preview