In re Jeffrey M.

62 App. Div. 2d 858, 406 N.Y.S.2d 71 (1978)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Jeffrey M.

New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
62 App. Div. 2d 858, 406 N.Y.S.2d 71 (1978)

Facts

Jeffrey M. (defendant) was 15 years old and had no record of delinquency. One cold night, Jeffrey and his friends were stranded away from home and asked the police for help. The police advised them to hitchhike. Hitchhiking was unsuccessful, so Jeffrey and the friends again asked the police for help. The police drove Jeffrey and the friends to a different highway with more traffic and a better chance of finding a ride, but the plan failed. As a last resort, one of the friends obtained a car that did not belong to him and drove Jeffrey and the friends home. A police officer (plaintiff) filed a delinquency petition in family court alleging that Jeffrey and the friends were delinquent as a result of having possession and control of the car of another. At Jeffrey’s delinquency hearing, the court adjourned the matter in contemplation of dismissal for 12 months, on the condition that Jeffrey attend school, participate in a community program, and use cars only in the presence of an adult. An adjournment in contemplation of dismissal (ACD) meant that if Jeffrey met the court’s conditions, the petition would be dismissed at the end of the 12 months. Jeffrey appealed, arguing that the ACD exceeded the statutory maximum period of six months.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Lupiano, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 814,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 814,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 814,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership