In re Jenkins
United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
2016 WL 3574081 (2016)
- Written by Joe Cox, JD
Facts
In 2007, Kenneth Harlan Jenkins (debtor) signed a promissory note with Heritage Banking Group (Heritage) (creditor) for a loan of $100,000. Indicated on the note as security were (1) a leaf/debris management system, (2) concrete-curbing machinery, (3) a golf cart, (4) a John Deere mule, (5) a lawn trailer, and (6) a portable generator/welder. The proceeds of the loan were to be used to purchase the listed collateral. The security agreement included the same description of collateral. Jenkins later admitted that he never bought the leaf/debris system or the concrete-curbing equipment, which had a total value of $76,475. In 2009, Jenkins’s landscaping business had slowed, and Jenkins asked Heritage to modify the terms of the note to lower his payment. Heritage did so. Jenkins, meanwhile, sold the lawn trailer in 2008, the mule in 2009, and the golf cart in 2010, with the three items obtaining about $3,100. Heritage’s security interest was later assigned to Trustmark National Bank (Trustmark). On May 8, 2014, Jenkins filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy. Trustmark filed an adversary proceeding, objecting to discharge for Jenkins and to the dischargeability of Jenkins’s debt to Trustmark. Trustmark argued that Jenkins’s failure to purchase some items and his disposal of other items constituted willful and malicious injury by Jenkins to Trustmark or its property. The matter was tried before the court, which made the question of the discharge of Jenkins’s debt to Trustmark ripe for ruling.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Ellington, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.