In re Jessica Z.

515 N.Y.S.2d 370 (1987)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Jessica Z.

New York Family Court
515 N.Y.S.2d 370 (1987)

Facts

Jessica M. was a baby who began having unexplained bouts of severe diarrhea over the course of four months that led to major surgery and nearly caused her death. The New York Commissioner of Social Services (the commissioner) (plaintiff) alleged that Jessica’s mother, Lori Z. (defendant), had intentionally caused Jessica’s condition and placed her at risk of death by giving Jessica laxatives from March to July 1986. The commissioner offered evidence that Lori had Munchausen syndrome by proxy (MSP), a psychological ailment that causes a parent to make a child sick or to fabricate a sickness. The factors for MSP, which were all present in Jessica’s case, included: (1) a child’s sickness with confounding symptoms, eluding diagnosis and impervious to medical treatment; (2) repeated hospitalizations and invasive procedures, such as surgery; (3) the child’s significant improvement when the parent has no access to the child; (4) the parent’s training in medicine or similar fields; (5) the parent’s extraordinary attention to the child while hospitalized; (6) the parent’s extraordinary support for medical personnel; and (7) a symbiotic relationship between the parent and the child. When a doctor finally suspected that Lori was making Jessica sick, the doctor tested Jessica’s stool in July 1986 and found phenophthalien, a chemical used to make laxatives. This laboratory report, in July 1986, was the only factual evidence that someone had given Jessica laxatives. Evidence regarding March to June 1986 remained circumstantial. At a child-abuse hearing that lasted for 14 days, expert witnesses testified both in favor of and against the notion that Lori had MSP and had caused Jessica’s condition. Considering the MSP factors, the New York Family Court found that Lori had given Jessica laxatives, causing her severe illness not only in July 1986 but from March to June 1986 as well. No other satisfactory alternative was provided to fit the facts of the case.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Miller, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 821,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 821,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 821,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership