Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

In re John Richards Homes Building Co.

United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
291 B.R. 727 (2003)


Facts

John Richards Homes Building Co. (JRH) (plaintiff) was a builder of expensive homes. Adell (defendant) signed a contract with JRH to purchase land and a newly constructed home built by JRH for about $3,000,000. A dispute arose between Adell and JRH about the construction of the home. Adell sued JRH based on numerous claims, and JRH countersued. Adell subsequently filed an involuntary bankruptcy petition in bankruptcy court against JRH and claimed $800,000 for fraud and breach of contract. JRH filed a motion to dismiss Adell’s involuntary bankruptcy petition, claiming that a bona fide dispute existed, under which the involuntary bankruptcy petition could not be allowed to proceed. The court dismissed Adell’s involuntary bankruptcy petition, because Adell knew or should have known that the claim was the subject of a bona fide dispute. During the course of the involuntary bankruptcy proceedings, Adell withheld critical information about the dispute from his bankruptcy attorney. Adell hired a public-relations firm to publicize the bankruptcy proceedings in an effort to damage JRH’s business and threatened JRH with criminal prosecution. Adell also falsely told other JRH creditors that they would only receive compensation on their claims if they joined his involuntary bankruptcy petition. After Adell’s involuntary bankruptcy petition was dismissed, JRH requested compensatory and punitive damages from Adell, alleging that the involuntary petition had been filed in bad faith.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Rhodes, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.