In re Johns-Manville Corp.
United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York
36 B.R. 727 (1984)
- Written by Abby Roughton, JD
Facts
Johns-Manville Corporation and its affiliates (collectively, Manville) (debtor) manufactured products containing asbestos. When asbestos exposure from Manville’s products began causing health issues, injured plaintiffs began suing Manville to recover. By August 1982, there were approximately 16,000 asbestos-exposure lawsuits pending against Manville, with the potential for thousands more in the following decades due to the sometimes-delayed manifestation of asbestos-related illnesses. Manville decided that it needed to book a $1.9 billion reserve to cover its asbestos-exposure liability, but doing so would have triggered the acceleration of $450 million in outstanding debt and possibly required a forced liquidation of some of Manville’s key business segments. Manville concluded that its only option was filing for bankruptcy, and it filed a chapter 11 petition. A committee comprised mostly of lawyers for asbestos victims (the asbestos committee) moved to dismiss Manville’s bankruptcy case, asserting that Manville had not filed its petition in good faith. Specifically, the asbestos committee alleged that Manville had fraudulently exaggerated its economic troubles to support its chapter 11 filing, and the asbestos committee presented evidence that it claimed supported its allegations regarding Manville’s intentional overcalculation of its financial concerns. In response, Manville presented data demonstrating that it had carefully and conservatively analyzed its financial situation and calculated the projected $1.9 billion debt figure. The bankruptcy court considered the parties’ arguments in ruling on the motion to dismiss.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Lifland, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.