In re Johnson
North Carolina Supreme Court
741 S.E.2d 308 (2012)
- Written by Darius Dehghan, JD
Facts
The Starboard by the Sea (Starboard) condominium had 139 residential units in 33 separate buildings. Starboard was managed by the Starboard Association, Inc. (association) (plaintiff). Jeffrey Johnson and Donna Johnson (defendants) owned one of the three units in Building 33. The Johnsons had a 1.06160 percent interest in Starboard’s common areas. In 2005, the association renovated the common areas in all the buildings except Building 33. In order to recoup the costs of the renovations, the association levied an assessment against the units in all the buildings except Building 33. In 2007, the association levied an assessment of $162,000 to renovate the common areas in Building 33. The 2007 assessment was levied only against the three units in Building 33. Further, the 2007 assessment was divided evenly among the three units in Building 33, such that the Johnsons were responsible for paying $54,000, or 33.33 percent of the assessment. The Johnsons paid $27,000 of the assessment under protest and made no additional payments. Subsequently, the association filed a lien against the Johnsons’ unit and initiated foreclosure proceedings. The Johnsons challenged the foreclosure, contending that the 2007 assessment was invalid. The trial court ruled in favor of the Johnsons. In finding that the 2007 assessment was invalid, the trial court determined that the 2005 and 2007 assessments were two separate assessments. The court of appeals also held that the 2007 assessment was invalid. The association appealed to the North Carolina Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Timmons-Goodson, J.)
Dissent (Martin, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.