In re Joint Eastern and Southern District Asbestos Litigation
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
14 F.3d 726 (1993)
- Written by Mary Phelan D'Isa, JD
Facts
The Keene Corporation purchased a manufacturer of asbestos-containing products, and within 10 years, it was embroiled in approximately 190,000 asbestos personal-injury claims. Despite settling almost half of those claims, Keene continued to be sued in about 2,000 new asbestos cases per month. To avoid bankruptcy, Keene filed suit in federal district court and requested class-action certification under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(1)(B) for a class of all persons with past, present, and future asbestos claims against it. Keene’s complaint, which sought a declaratory judgment that Keene was not liable to the defendants for asbestos-related injuries, also sought court assistance to negotiate and approve a settlement to resolve the claims with the limited funds Keene had available at the time. Keene further alleged that such a settlement would avoid a potential bankruptcy for Keene and give the claimants a more fair and expeditious settlement of their claims than what they would receive in a bankruptcy proceeding. The district court found that a limited fund existed and certified a class under Rule 23(b)(1)(B). The court also enjoined Keene and all class members from continuing or initiating any asbestos-related claims against Keene—exempting those cases already in trial. An appeal was taken.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Winter, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
