In re Jordan Schiff

Docket No. HP 22/92 (1993)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
I
From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Jordan Schiff

Supreme Court of New York
Docket No. HP 22/92 (1993)

RL

Facts

Jordan Schiff (defendant) practiced as an attorney at the law firm of Shapiro & Yankowitz. During a deposition of one of Schiff’s clients at the offices of Shapiro & Yankowitz, Schiff lost his temper toward Mark, the female attorney conducting the deposition, and walked out of the room. Yankowitz, a senior partner, entered the room and shouted intimidating and derogatory remarks toward Mark. Schiff then returned and directed a number of vulgar, gender-biased insults at Mark. The court reporter documented several objections lodged by Mark on the record and also witnessed additional degrading comments made off the record. A judge ordered Schiff to apologize to Mark. Another judge ordered sanctions against Shapiro & Yankowitz on two separate occasions. A third judge referred Schiff to the disciplinary committee of the New York State Supreme Court. In spite of prior sanctions, the evidence at Schiff’s disciplinary hearing showed that he had engaged in sexual harassment of a female attorney on at least one other occasion.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Elsen, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 788,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 788,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 788,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Legal Ethics

Key Terms