Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

In re Juvenile Appeal (83-CD)

Connecticut Supreme Court
455 A.2d 1313 (1983)


Facts

A mother of six children (defendant) was monitored by the Connecticut Department of Youth Services (DCYS) (plaintiff) beginning in 1976. A DCYS caseworker, Michelle Spicknall, visited the family home 27 times during the first nine months of 1979. Spicknall determined that the home environment was on the cusp of being problematic but that the children were happy and cared for by their mother. On September 4, 1979, defendant’s nine-month-old child, Christopher, died after being brought to a hospital. The cause of death was unknown. On his body were superficial marks that proved unrelated to his death. There were no internal injuries. A Connecticut statute permitted DCYS to take custody of children for 96 hours if the children were “in immediate physical danger.” On the basis of that law, DCYS took temporary custody of defendant’s children on September 5, 1979. Two days later, pursuant to a different statute allowing awards of temporary custody to protect child welfare, DCYS filed a petition to extend its custody of defendant’s children. At the hearing, Spicknall testified as to defendant’s home environment and beer-drinking habits. Christopher’s doctor testified to the lack of evidence linking the child’s death to his home environment or his mother’s conduct. The court concluded that temporary custody was justified. Defendant appealed, challenging the constitutionality of the temporary-custody statute.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Speziale, C. J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 200,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.