In re Kathawala

9 F.3d 942, 28 U.S.P.Q.2d 1785 (1993)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Kathawala

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
9 F.3d 942, 28 U.S.P.Q.2d 1785 (1993)

Facts

Faizulla Kathawala sought to patent a group of compounds that could inhibit an enzyme in the biosynthesis of cholesterol. Kathawala filed patent applications in Greece and Spain on November 21, 1983, disclosing four elements: (1) the compounds themselves, (2) compositions, (3) methods of use, and (4) processes for making the compounds. The Greek application claimed all four, but the Spanish application claimed only the processes. The Greek patent issued on October 2, 1984; the Spanish patent issued on January 21, 1985. On April 11, 1985, Kathawala filed a United States patent application for the invention, claiming all four disclosures. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) board of appeals rejected the application because a statutory provision prohibited the filing of an American patent more than one year after the filing of a foreign patent on the same invention. Kathawala appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Kathawala argued that the invention was not actually patented in Greece because Greek law only allowed for processes to be claimed (as opposed to the other three disclosures). Kathawala also argued that the Spanish patent did not become effective on the date of issue but rather on a later publication date. Finally, Kathawala argued that Spanish application did not claim the same invention as the American application because the Spanish application only claimed processes.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Lourie, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership