In re Kaufman
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
37 P.3d 845 (2001)
- Written by Denise McGimsey, JD
Facts
Through a structured settlement agreement resolving a wrongful death suit, John Kaufman (defendant) received a monthly payment stream funded by an annuity. The settlement agreement denied Kaufman the “power to sell, mortgage, encumber or anticipate the future payments by assignment or otherwise.” Despite that prohibition, Kaufman sold 60 monthly annuity payments to J.G. Wentworth S.S.C., Limited Partnership (Wentworth) (plaintiff) in exchange for a lump sum. Within a year after the transaction, the payments to Wentworth ceased. Kaufman filed for bankruptcy a few months later and identified the agreement with Wentworth as an unsecured claim. Wentworth moved the bankruptcy court for a release of the automatic stay in order to seize the annuity payments. In response, Kaufman contended that the purchase agreement was invalid because the settlement agreement restricted him from assigning the payments in the first place. The bankruptcy court certified issues of state law to the Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Kauger, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 789,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.