In re Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc. Shareholder Litigation
New York Court of Appeals
27 N.Y. 3d 268, 52 N.E. 3d 214 (2016)
- Written by Eric Miller, JD
Facts
Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc. (KCP) (defendant), an apparel company, had two classes of common stock: Class A (each share entitled to one vote) and Class B (each share entitled to 10 votes). KCP founder Kenneth Cole (defendant) held 46 percent of the Class A stock and all of the Class B stock. Cole sought to implement a going-private merger under which KCP would cease to be a publicly traded company. KCP’s board of directors (defendants) established a special committee of independent directors to carry out the transaction. Cole made an offer of $15 for each outstanding share, subject to the approval of (1) the special committee and (2) a majority vote of the minority (i.e., non-Cole) holders of the common stock. The price was later increased and approved at $15.25 per share. A group of minority shareholders (plaintiffs) brought a class-action lawsuit, alleging breach of fiduciary duties by Cole, KCP, and the directors. The court dismissed the complaint for failure to allege any facts that would show a fiduciary-duty breach. The appellate division affirmed. One of the minority shareholders, Erie County Employees Retirement System (plaintiff), argued that the applicable standard of review was the entire-fairness standard, which would place the burden of showing a fair process and fair price on the corporation’s directors—as opposed to the much more deferential business-judgment rule. The case was appealed to the New York Court of Appeals.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Stein, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.