In re Kohn’s Estate
New York Surrogate Court
124 N.Y.S.2d 861 (1953)
- Written by Sharon Feldman, JD
Facts
The decedent Viktor Kohn had joint accounts with his uncle Otakar Kohn in three New York banks (defendants). Viktor’s administratrix, Antonie Mautner (plaintiff), petitioned the court to declare that Otakar predeceased Viktor, entitling Viktor to the accounts, and to direct the banks to pay the deposits to Mautner. The banks maintained there was insufficient proof that Otakar predeceased Viktor. Mautner presented evidence that Viktor and his wife and children were deported from Prague, Czechoslovakia, to the concentration camp at Lodz on October 26, 1941; Viktor’s brother Oskar and uncle Otakar were sent to the concentration camp at Terezin in 1942; and Oskar and Otakar were transferred “to the east” on August 20, 1942, and October 22, 1942, respectively. Mautner submitted copies of the decrees of various Czechoslovakian courts, one fixing October 26, 1943, as the presumed date of Viktor and his wife’s deaths and April 26, 1942, as the presumed date of the children’s deaths; another fixing February 20, 1943, as the presumed date of Oskar’s death; and another fixing April 22, 1943, as the presumed date of Otakar’s death. A Czechoslovakian-law expert explained that in fixing death dates, certain camps were known to be extermination camps and others like Lodz were not; deportation “to the east” usually meant deportation to an extermination camp; the elderly and young could not have survived concentration-camp conditions; and in some camps, the elderly, sick, and very young were killed immediately upon or shortly after arrival.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Collins, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.