In re Kvamme
United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of North Dakota
93 B.R. 698 (1988)
- Written by Abby Roughton, JD
Facts
Tim and Teri Kvamme (debtors) filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. The Kvammes submitted multiple proposed reorganization plans over nearly two years. At a hearing on the Kvammes’ third amended plan, the bankruptcy court warned the Kvammes that they had only one more chance to propose a confirmable plan. The Kvammes subsequently filed their fourth amended plan. Farmers Home Administration (FmHA) (creditor) objected to the plan. FmHA had a claim against the Kvammes for $174,234.72 and had elected under 11 U.S.C. § 1111(b) to have its claim treated as a secured claim. The Kvammes’ plan proposed to pay FmHA for the value of FmHA’s collateral, including (1) cattle with a market value of $45,400, amortized over 15 years with 9 percent interest and paid in 15 installments of $5,632.27 and (2) machinery with a market value of $5,600, amortized over seven years at 7 percent interest and paid in seven installments of $1,112.67. The total combined amount of these payments equaled $92,272.74. FmHA asserted that the plan did not reflect FmHA’s § 1111(b) election because the plan did not provide for FmHA to receive payment of its total allowed claim of $174,234.72. In addition to FmHA’s objection, another creditor moved to dismiss the bankruptcy proceeding based on the Kvammes’ failure to propose a confirmable plan.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hill, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 964,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,500 briefs, keyed to 1,006 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
- AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New
Understand your casebook readings in seconds
Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.
Get instant access to over 47,500+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,006 law school casebooks.

