In re Lanza

322 A.2d 445 (1974)

From our private database of 46,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Lanza

New Jersey Supreme Court
322 A.2d 445 (1974)

Play video

Facts

Elizabeth Greene hired an attorney, Guy Lanza (defendant), to represent her in the sale of her home. James and Joan Connolly agreed to purchase the home from Greene, with a separate broker drafting an agreement between the parties. After the contract was drawn up by the broker, Lanza agreed to also represent the Connollys to complete the purchase. Lanza did not inform Greene of this prior to being hired by the Connollys. At the closing, the Connollys informed Greene that they would be $1,000 short, but would postdate a check for one month after the closing for that same amount. Greene agreed to this arrangement. However, when Greene attempted to deposit the check one month later, the transaction could not be completed. Greene contacted the Connollys, who informed Greene that they would not deposit the funds into their account, because the cellar in the home was prone to flooding and would cost $1,000 to repair. Greene contacted Lanza regarding the situation, but Lanza did not act. The Bergen County Ethics Committee (plaintiff) brought this action against Lanza in the New Jersey Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 744,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 744,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,000 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 744,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,000 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership