Supreme Court of Texas
411 S.W.3d 445 (Tex. 2013)
Benjamin Redus (plaintiff) filed a petition against Stephanie Lee (defendant), seeking a change of custody of their minor daughter and alleging a material change in circumstances. Stephanie had been the child’s primary custodian until she relinquished care and possession of the child to Benjamin for approximately six months. Benjamin claimed that Stephanie’s poor parenting decisions had placed the child in danger, including an ongoing pattern of neglect and contact with Stephanie’s husband, Scott Lee, who was a registered sex offender. Benjamin requested an order (1) requiring that Stephanie’s contact with the child be supervised and (2) enjoining Stephanie from permitting the child to be within 20 miles of Scott and requiring Stephanie to timely provide Benjamin with Scott’s whereabouts in order to verify compliance with the 20-mile restriction. Prior to trial, Benjamin and Stephanie attended mediation, which culminated in a mediated settlement agreement (MSA) that provided Benjamin with custody of the child, gave Stephanie access to and possession of the child, and enjoined Scott from being within five miles of the child at all times. Benjamin and Stephanie agreed that the MSA was binding on both parties and not subject to revocation by either party. During a subsequent hearing before a trial court to approve the MSA, Benjamin provided testimony pertaining to the need for the mileage-restriction clause. The trial court refused to approve and enter a judgment on the MSA, reasoning that the agreement was not in the best interests of the minor child. Stephanie petitioned for a writ of mandamus. The court of appeals affirmed. The Supreme Court of Texas granted certiorari to review.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Lehrmann, J.)
Concurrence (Guzman, J.)
Dissent (Green, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.