In re Lee
United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California
94 B.R. 172 (1989)
Chile and Hae Sook Lee (the Lees) (debtors) were the sole shareholders and operators of the Seoul Corporation (Seoul) (debtor), a merchandise and jewelry wholesaler. Seoul filed for reorganization under chapter 11 of the bankruptcy code, and then the Lees a filed a second chapter 11 case on their own behalf. The Lees and Seoul had a number of overlapping creditors, and the two debtors shared joint liability on many debts. Both the Lees and Seoul sought to be represented by the same law firm. The law firm filed parallel applications with the bankruptcy court for appointment as counsel to both chapter 11 cases but intentionally withheld the related nature of the filings. The law firm affirmed in both cases that it was not connected with any other interested party except for the debtor. The bankruptcy court became aware of the parallel applications and issued an order to show cause as to why the law firm should not be disqualified from representing both parties.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Bufford, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.