In re Lewis

363 B.R. 477 (2007)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Lewis

United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of South Carolina
363 B.R. 477 (2007)

Facts

On or about October 4, 2006, Randolph Lewis, Jr., agreed to purchase a vehicle from Lexington Automotive & Truck Outlet, Inc. (Lexington). The next day, Lewis executed a promissory note to obtain a loan from Regional’s (creditor) subsidiary, Sun Financial, and gave Sun Financial a security interest in the vehicle. Sun Financial assigned the note and security interest to Regional. On November 7, 2006, Lewis and his wife (debtors) filed for bankruptcy under chapter 13 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (Bankruptcy Code). Lewis and his wife filed a chapter 13 plan that treated Regional as a secured creditor. Although all the requisite motor-vehicle documentation to obtain the vehicle’s certificate of title was dated October 4, 2006, Lexington did not deliver the documentation to the South Carolina Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) until November 15, 2006. A few days later, the DMV issued the certificate of title, which listed Sun Financial’s lien with a date of October 4, 2006. During bankruptcy proceedings, the bankruptcy trustee objected to the treatment of Regional’s claim as a secured claim.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Duncan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership