In re Lockheed Martin Corp.
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
503 F.3d 351, 2007 AMC 3304 (2007)
- Written by Carolyn Strutton, JD
Facts
Lockheed Martin Corp. (defendant) owned a ship that was damaged at sea in 2001. The vessel was insured by National Casualty Company (National) (plaintiff). Lockheed submitted a claim to National for the damage in 2005. National filed a declaratory-judgment action under admiralty jurisdiction in federal district court, seeking a declaration that Lockheed’s claim was time-barred under the policy, or in the alternative a declaration of the amount of Lockheed’s loss. Because National’s claims were brought under admiralty jurisdiction, the parties were not entitled to a jury trial. Lockheed filed a counterclaim seeking payment of its insurance claim. Lockheed requested that National’s claim for a declaratory determination of the amount of the loss be dismissed so that Lockheed’s counterclaim, which raised the same issue, could be brought before a jury. The district court concluded that Lockheed’s claim was not time-barred under the provisions of the insurance policy and therefore dismissed National’s first declaratory request. The court further held that Lockheed did not have a right to a jury trial and declined to dismiss National’s second request for declaratory relief. Lockheed filed a writ of mandamus to challenge the court’s denial of its right to a jury trial.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Traxler, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 967,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,500 briefs, keyed to 1,007 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
- AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New
Understand your casebook readings in seconds
Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.
Get instant access to over 47,500+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,007 law school casebooks.
