In re M.B. and N.B.

709 N.W.2d 11 (2006)

From our private database of 47,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re M.B. and N.B.

North Dakota Supreme Court
709 N.W.2d 11 (2006)

Facts

I.B. and K.S. (defendants) had two children, M.B. and N.B. The children witnessed domestic violence between their parents, and according to K.S., they were abused by I.B. In 2002, a juvenile court declared the children deprived, removed them from the family home, and placed them in foster care. After mandatory family counseling, the children were reunified with their parents. When I.B. and K.S. separated, K.S. was awarded custody. However, twice that year, the children were again declared deprived and placed in social services’ care. State social worker Marlene Sorum (plaintiff) petitioned for the termination of K.S.’s and I.B.’s parental rights. K.S. consented, but I.B. objected, arguing that he wanted to care for the children. At trial, the children’s therapist testified that I.B. exposed the children to pornography and horror movies and engaged in sexual activities in their presence. She also testified that the children complained of a lack of food at I.B.’s home, seemed to be suffering from posttraumatic stress disorder in addition to already diagnosed behavioral disorders, and acted out in their parents’ presence. Based on the evidence, the trial court terminated I.B.’s parental rights. I.B. appealed, arguing that there was insufficient evidence to support the termination.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Sandstrom, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 905,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 905,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,100 briefs, keyed to 995 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 905,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,100 briefs - keyed to 995 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership