In Re M.J. & K. Co., Inc.
United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York
161 Bankr. 586 (1993)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
M.J. & K. Co., Inc. (debtor) operated bookstores at Brooklyn Law School (BLS) and other New York law schools. The license agreement with BLS allowed M.J. & K. to sell only bookstore-related products beginning in 1982 “for a period of one year with a three-year contract to follow if Brooklyn law school is satisfied.” M.J. & K. operated the bookstore until faculty complained that the bookstore lacked required books. BLS solicited bids from other vendors to operate the bookstore. Shortly thereafter, the dean learned M.J. & K. had filed bankruptcy and was involved in litigation with a major book publisher. Three other publishers refused to ship books without cash on delivery. BLS inventoried the bookstore and found it had less than half the books needed for spring semester. M.J. & K. responded with old inventory lists including books from other bookstores not needed for BLS courses. M.J. & K’s counsel advised that BLS could not interfere with M.J. & K.’s operations absent relief from the automatic bankruptcy stay. BLS requested relief to serve a notice to quit the premises, arguing that M.J. & K.’s license expired in 1983. M.J. & K. argued it had a long-term license effective until December 1995 with guaranteed sales. Its principal admitted the bookstore had no cash to buy books but said he would personally finance the books using lines of credit exceeding $50,000.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Garrity Jr., J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.