In re Mabray
Court of Appeals of Texas
2010 WL 3448198 (2010)
Mary (plaintiff) and Gary (defendant) Mabray sought the assistance of an attorney named Keen. Keen agreed to assist Mary and Gary in dissolving their marriage. Keen, Mary, and Gary signed a cooperative law dispute resolution agreement. Mary and Gary's resolution efforts were unsuccessful, but Keen continued to represent Gary. Mary asserted that Keen should be disqualified. Mary alleged that Keen's continued representation of Gary violated a Texas collaborative law statute. Gary argued that Keen could remain as his counsel, because Gary and Mary did not enter into a collaborative-law agreement. Rather, Gary argued, the agreement that he and Mary entered into was a cooperative-law agreement. Under a cooperative-law agreement, the lawyer was not required to enter into a contract with the opposing party that compelled the lawyer's disqualification in a subsequent divorce proceeding. Despite Mary's objections, the trial court determined that the agreement was a cooperative-law agreement and therefore did not need to adapt to Texas's collaborative-law statute. Mary appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Higley, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.