In re Majestic Star Casino, Limited Liability Corporation
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
716 F.3d 736 (2013)
- Written by Ryan Hill, JD
Facts
Barden was the sole shareholder of Barden Development, Inc. (BDI). Majestic Star Casino II, Inc. (Majestic) (plaintiff) was a wholly owned subsidiary of BDI. BDI was an S corporation under the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) for tax purposes, and Majestic was therefore a qualified subchapter S subsidiary (QSub) corporation. Under the IRC, S corporations and QSub corporations avoid paying federal tax at the corporate level, because the taxes are paid by the shareholders. Majestic filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy in November 2009. After Majestic filed its petition, Barden successfully petitioned the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for revocation of BDI’s S corporation status. As a result of the revocation, Majestic lost its QSub status and was therefore subject to paying federal taxes. Majestic filed a complaint with the bankruptcy court, alleging that the revocation of BDI’s S corporation status and the subsequent loss of Majestic’s QSub status was an unlawful post-petition property transfer from Majestic’s estate. The bankruptcy court ruled in favor of Majestic and ordered Barden and the IRS to reinstate BDI’s S corporation status and Majestic’s status as a QSub. This case was certified for a direct appeal.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Jordan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.