In re Mangia Pizza Investments
United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Texas
480 B.R. 669 (2012)
Mangia Pizza Investments (Mangia) (debtor) operated a number of pizza restaurants. Mangia filed for reorganization under chapter 11 of the bankruptcy code. HEB Grocery Company (HEB) (creditor) had a pre-petition lease with Mangia. As the debtor in possession, Mangia rejected the lease, and HEB received a claim against the estate for unpaid rent. HEB’s unpaid-rent claim was secured by Mangia’s security deposit, which covered the full amount due to HEB and remained in HEB’s possession. Mangia filed a reorganization plan with the bankruptcy court. Before the court approved Mangia’s plan, Cloud Cap (creditor) purchased a claim from one of Mangia’s creditors and filed a competing disclosure statement and reorganization plan. Cloud Cap’s competing proposal altered HEB’s secured claim so that Mangia would pay the unpaid-rent claim with separate funds, rather than from the security deposit. Additionally, Cloud Cap’s proposal provided that Mangia would pay HEB’s secured claim within 30 days of the plan’s effective date, rather than as an instant setoff against the security deposit on the effective date. According to Cloud Cap, this delay in HEB’s payment made HEB an impaired creditor. As an impaired creditor, HEB would be able to vote to confirm or reject Mangia’s reorganization plan. Mangia objected to Cloud Cap’s proposal, arguing that HEB’s claim was unimpaired under both plans. Mangia argued that Cloud Cap’s proposal for a 30-day delay on HEB’s claim was an artificial impairment designed to give HEB voting rights.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Gargotta, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 177,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.