Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

In re Manuel

507 F.2d 990 (1975)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 35,600+ case briefs...

In re Manuel

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

507 F.2d 990 (1975)

Facts

On December 7, 1972, James Lucius Manuel (debtor) purchased seven pieces of furniture from Roberts Furniture Co. (Roberts) (creditor). Manuel and Roberts entered into a purchase-money security agreement for the furniture, under which Manuel granted Roberts a security interest in the furniture as collateral for Roberts’s financing. On February 13, 1973, Manuel purchased a television from Roberts. Manuel and Roberts entered into another purchase-money security agreement, which also encompassed the first agreement. Under the new agreement, the remaining balance from the first agreement—approximately $450—was added to the price of the television—approximately $175—for a total balance of approximately $625. The new agreement did not explain what amount was due for each piece of furniture or the order in which the purchases would be paid off. The agreement provided that the furniture and television would secure all present and future debts owed to Roberts by Manuel. Roberts did not file the agreement to perfect its security interest. Later in 1973, Manuel filed for bankruptcy. Roberts filed a claim in the bankruptcy estate, claiming priority because it had a purchase-money security interest in the furniture and television. The bankruptcy court found that Roberts did not have a purchase-money security interest in the furniture, and that Roberts had failed to perfect any security interest in the furniture. The district court affirmed the bankruptcy court. The district court also stated that a purchase-money security interest was likely not created in the television but explained that it could not reach the question because it was not brought up on appeal. Roberts appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Nichols, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 618,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 618,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 618,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 35,600 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership