In re Manuel R.

207 Conn. 725, 543 A.2d 719 (1988)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Manuel R.

Connecticut Supreme Court
207 Conn. 725, 543 A.2d 719 (1988)

Facts

The state (plaintiff) charged Manuel R. (defendant) with robbery. The juvenile court ordered Manuel R. to serve one year of probation on a burglary charge. Several months later, a probation officer filed a petition alleging Manuel R. violated the probation order. At a hearing for detention and all subsequent adjudicatory hearings, an attorney represented Manuel R. At the adjudicatory hearing, Manuel R. and his mother stated to the court that they did not want to proceed with the assigned attorney. When the court informed Manuel R. no other attorney could represent him, his mother stated she would represent Manuel R. The trial court then proceeded to the dispositional hearing without an attorney for Manuel R. The trial court asked whether Manuel R.’s mother would waive the right to counsel for Manuel R., and his mother waived his right to counsel. The trial court then sentenced Manuel R. to two years of detention with the Department of Children and Youth Services (DCYS). Manuel R. appealed the disposition committing him to the custody of DCYS to the appellate court, and the Connecticut Supreme Court transferred his appeal to the supreme court under Practice Book Section 4023.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Peters, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership