In re Mariah T.

71 Cal. Rptr. 3d 542 (2008)

From our private database of 47,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Mariah T.

California Court of Appeal
71 Cal. Rptr. 3d 542 (2008)

Facts

Eight-year-old Mariah T. and three-year-old Bryce T. lived with their mother, Monique T. (defendant), and Monique’s boyfriend, Jason. Mariah told her father, Anthony T., that Jason came into her room twice at night, laid next to her, touched her near her crotch, and indicated she should keep quiet. Anthony reported the incidents to the Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) (plaintiff), which investigated. Mariah told a social worker that she had informed Monique of the incidents but that Monique had dismissed the allegations, accused Mariah of lying, and threatened that Mariah would not see Anthony again if she told anyone else what Jason had allegedly done. Mariah and Bryce also told the social worker that Monique whipped them with a belt, sometimes leaving marks and bruises. Mariah claimed that three times, Monique used the belt to whip Bryce across his stomach. Based on the allegations of corporal punishment and failure to protect against sexual abuse, DCFS initiated a dependency proceeding, meaning a proceeding to ensure the safety of minors being neglected or abused. DCFS sought to have the children declared dependents of the court and removed from Monique’s custody. Monique admitted to using a belt on Mariah and Bryce’s buttocks once, but she minimized any other corporal punishment, claimed that Mariah was a compulsive liar, and denied that Mariah ever told her of Jason’s alleged misconduct. The trial court found Mariah’s testimony more credible than Monique’s testimony. It therefore granted DCFS’s petition, declaring the children dependents of the court, removing them from Monique’s home, and ultimately placing them with Anthony. Monique appealed, arguing that there was insufficient evidence to support the court’s orders.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Rubin, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 905,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 905,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,100 briefs, keyed to 995 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 905,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,100 briefs - keyed to 995 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership